Orbit: Crypto Community Feed

Bitcoin Short-Term Trading Strategy $BTC current price is around $63,400, with an intraday high of $63,918 and a low of $62,822. It is still within the large volatile range of $62K–66K, and the short-term direction is unclear. US inflation data is relatively mild, but BTC's positive response is moderate, indicating that buying strength is not yet strong. Resistance: $63,900–64,200 After breaking through and stabilizing, look towards $64,800–65,000. Support: $63,000–62,800 If it breaks below, watch $62,500 → $62,000. $62,500 is also an important mid-term defense level currently. Trading Ideas Hold above $64,000, with a pullback that does not break it → bullish bias Break below $62,800, with a failed rebound → bearish bias Currently, $63,400 is right in the middle of the range. I prefer to wait for the price to reach either side before making a choice, rather than chasing the middle. This is only a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice.

$CORE I saw someone saying that if this thing rises by dozens or hundreds of times years later, the things I said will be heavily criticized. What I want to emphasize is that even if it rises in the future, it doesn't mean much. If it rises, that is also a very normal thing; even a vapor coin has a chance to rise. However, objectively speaking, this thing has already dropped by hundreds of times, and the facts prove that what the project team said and did completely do not match the factual logic. May I ask, have all the things he said been implemented one by one? Even if not implemented, if it rises by dozens or hundreds of times, can it prove that painting a rosy picture is also a successful method? Is there any problem with the logic I am expressing now?

The upcoming market trend will most likely unfold in three stages, so don't rush, let's take it one step at a time. 🥇 First leg $BTC Institutions lead the charge, with ETF funds at the forefront. As long as BTC holds steady, the market heats up—don't go against the big money. 🥈 Second leg $ETH BTC sets the stage, Ethereum takes the spotlight. Stablecoin liquidity, RWA, AI narratives—all rely on the Ethereum ecosystem. Once on-chain activity picks up, its momentum will surpass BTC by far. 🥉 Third leg $OKB This is the most flexible phase—real users on layer X, GAS consumption, application deployment. If any of these data points get confirmed, OKB’s catch-up potential will be huge. In short, this is a race: whoever’s story gets validated by data first will explode first. Which leg is your pick? Share your positions in the comments~ Risk reminder: The above is only a market phase analysis and does not constitute investment advice. Please do not trade blindly based on this.

$OKB $BTC $ASTER .... The SEC unexpectedly canceled the August 14 meeting regarding the issuance of new regulations for Crypto. According to Reuters and other sources related to Crypto, the White House is concerned that "an exception in regulations from the SEC could negatively impact the upcoming Clarity Act negotiations." The SEC only issued a brief notice: Due to unforeseen scheduling, no new date has been announced. The possibility of the Clarity Act being passed in September is becoming very promising $XRP is eagerly awaiting Clarity

ETH$ETH At this current market situation, I actually feel a bit expectant. Not because it has already broken through, but because it increasingly resembles a tightly compressed spring. After the high of 1925 and subsequent pullback, ETH has been grinding around 1880, with almost all 1H short-term moving averages overlapping, and volume has noticeably shrunk since the peak. Both bulls and bears are waiting. At times like this, the most important thing is not to predict, but to prepare your trading plan in advance. Upside: 1900. A breakout with volume and a stable hold above, the first target is 1920-1925. If 1925 is broken again, it indicates bulls may start a new round of attack. Downside: 1865. After a volume-driven break below, don’t rush to bottom-fish; first watch 1860, then around 1850. Middle: no action. In the 1880-1900 range, I prefer to stay out and wait. Because truly good trades don’t open positions every day, but dare to execute when key levels appear. Right now, ETH is waiting for an answer: Will 1900 break first, or 1865? Before the answer comes out, patience is the greatest advantage.

$CORE released a Bitcoin power grid narrative on its official Twitter early this morning; grand concepts require rational scrutiny🔶 The official release this morning introduced a new argument: for Bitcoin financial products to achieve yield, collateralization, payment, and acceleration, they all need to connect to CORE to build a Bitcoin power grid. A familiar script plays out again. The market has been consolidating sideways for a long time, confidence in holdings continues to erode, and the long-term narrative is launched punctually this morning. Grand blueprints easily stir the expectations of trapped investors. Clarify narrative loopholes: there is no single channel in the BTCFi track; various Bitcoin layer-2 and staking protocols continue to develop, and there are many underlying options for Bitcoin-related services. The "must connect" claim is just an expectation being created. Distinguish between long-term plans and current reality. The power grid requires stable carrying capacity, but the current ecosystem’s DEX liquidity is sluggish, active applications are scarce, and the long-term blueprint cannot support the current market. The promotion keeps emphasizing the potential of dormant Bitcoin but rarely mentions the high competition within the track. Having long-term space in the track does not mean projects can stably capture the market. The preference for early morning announcements is clear: during the day, people verify information with data; at early morning hours, most are resting, so long-term stories more easily influence expectations and stabilize on-chain holdings. The narrative can only temporarily ease holding anxiety; on-chain data does not lie. Realizing the vision depends on continuously iterated products and incremental capital; relying solely on concepts cannot break the consolidation pattern. Do you all expect this Bitcoin power grid narrative to be realized in the future? ⚠️ Risk reminder: This is only a market logic discussion and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency carries extremely high risk; participate rationally.

Standard Chartered now says its $100 $UNI target for 2030 may be too low. The argument comes from Uniswap averaging roughly $244,000 in daily protocol revenue between July 27 and August 12. Because that revenue funds UNI buybacks and burns, the short sample annualizes to about $89.1 million. Robinhood Chain supplied around 60% of the revenue. I see improving token fundamentals here, but not proof of a $100 valuation. The burn estimate comes from only 17 days, while most of the new revenue is concentrated on one recently launched chain. If activity normalizes, the annualized figure can reset quickly. The real confirmation would be sustained revenue across several chains. A working fee to burn mechanism matters, but one strong burst should not be extrapolated through 2030. #CPIPPIEaseFedSplit #AIInfraEarningsWatch #SpaceX99%ValueFromAI $BTC $ETH

The move near 63400 is not a bottom reversal; it should be seen as a recovery after a sharp drop. From 64450 down to 62800 in the early morning, the 4-hour candle showed increased volume and closed bearish. Subsequent rebounds failed twice to hold above 63800, so downward pressure remains. Although 62800 formed a lower shadow, it only indicates some support, not a successful Spring. According to Bajie’s analysis, today is more likely to see a rebound first, then further downward pressure: initially targeting 63800–64000, with a stronger move reaching 64200–64450; if there is a high-volume spike but it fails to hold, the main force will likely retest 63300, and if 62800 is broken again, look for 62500–62200. Today's high is expected around 63800–64200, low around 62500–62800, with the close still biased weak. On the capital side, open interest dropped from above 111000 to 109475, indicating deleveraging among longs during the decline, but the price did not reclaim 64000; the long-short account ratio remains near 1.85, and funding rates are positive, meaning longs have not been fully flushed out. In other words, the rebound after the drop looks more like a repair, not a trend reversal. Only if the 4-hour candle closes above 64450 and holds above 64000 on a pullback will the bearish path be invalidated. $BTC $