
#OracleAICloudUp121%
About OracleAICloudUp121%
Oracle's latest earnings showed OCI AI cloud revenue up 121% YoY, RPO at $664B, and over $30B in new AI contracts in Q1. Expansion comes at a cost: capex hit $28.5B, FCF was around negative $5.4B, and Oracle raised $20B via ATM issuance. On Sept 12, co-founder Larry Ellison cancelled a planned sale of up to $7.5B in Oracle shares. Adobe also beat and raised guidance but sold off post-earnings. The bar for AI companies is shifting from 'is there growth' to 'is it profitable and sustainable'.
Populare
Cele mai recente
OracleAICloudUp121% Postări populare

Enterprises only need to shift ~2% of operating spend from labor and services into compute to support the entire hyperscaler AI buildout.
It looks expensive today because $GOOGL, $AMZN, $MSFT, $ORCL and $META are spending now while the savings and AI revenue arrive later.#FOMCRateCallThisWeek #CLARITYVoteFails50-49 #AISafetyDebateEscalates
#OracleAdobeToday AI demand is no longer the question. The bill is 👀
Oracle has a massive $638B backlog, but investors want to see how quickly it becomes revenue and whether that cash can outrun AI capex. Adobe faces a similar test with Firefly and GenStudio: can AI lift revenue without eating margins?
What caught my attention is the shift.
From Oracle's cloud to Adobe's software and Apple's AI hardware, the race is moving from building AI to proving it actually pays
#OracleAICloudUp121% Oracle’s AI cloud revenue grew 121% YoY, accelerating from 93% last quarter. That’s the number that immediately stood out to me 🚀
Revenue and EPS both beat estimates, remaining performance obligations increased from $638B to $664B, and Oracle raised its guidance. Demand clearly isn’t the problem.
The tension is what it costs to meet that demand. Data-center capex remains high, free cash flow is still under pressure, and a huge backlog only becomes valuable when Oracle can deliver the capacity and convert contracts into profitable revenue 🏗️
Adobe also beat expectations and raised its full-year outlook, yet the market remains cautious about how quickly its AI products can create incremental revenue.
To me, both reports point to the same question: AI demand is visible, but when does it become efficient growth?
Oracle’s acceleration is impressive. The next milestone is proving that infrastructure spending can eventually strengthen—not continually absorb—cash flow.

Oracle's U.S. stock closed down 5.38% last night, wiping out $25 billion in market value in one day. After the earnings report was released post-close, the stock surged over 8% in after-hours trading. This veteran giant, originally known for its database business, now mainly makes money by renting computing power to AI companies.
Q1 revenue was $19.3 billion, up 30% year-over-year, with cloud infrastructure revenue#PPIHotCPINext #OracleAICloudUp121% #BTCSpotETFOutflows

#OracleAdobeToday AI demand is no longer the question. The bill is 👀
Oracle has a massive $638B backlog, but investors want to see how quickly it becomes revenue and whether that cash can outrun AI capex. Adobe faces a similar test with Firefly and GenStudio: can AI lift revenue without eating margins?
What caught my attention is the shift.
From Oracle's cloud to Adobe's software and Apple's AI hardware, the race is moving from building AI to proving it actually pays.

Oracle, Adobe, Today: AI demand isn’t the issue anymore. The cost is 👀
Oracle has a huge $638B backlog, but investors are keen to see how fast it turns into revenue and if that cash can surpass AI spending. Adobe faces a similar challenge with Firefly and GenStudio: can AI boost revenue without
From Oracle’s cloud to Adobe’s software and Apple’s AI hardware, the focus is shifting from creating AI to showing it actually pays off.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90%

Oracle’s latest earnings show the market is starting to reward real AI execution, not just hype. AI cloud revenue jumped 121% YoY, while RPO climbed to $664B and guidance improved. Adobe also beat estimates, yet shares fell as investors demand stronger AI monetization and cash flow. For BTC, massive AI capex keeps liquidity expansion relevant, but near-term direction still depends on inflation, rates, and tonight’s CPI. Execution matters more than promises
9.11 | Strategii timpurii de tranzacționare pentru Pancake și Ethereum
Strategia de tranzacționare de astăzi este clară: în principal poziții short la niveluri ridicate în timpul rebound-urilor și evită absolut cumpărarea pozițiilor lungi înainte de implementarea CPI-ului
$BTC În prezent, tranzacționând lateral aproape de 76.800, PPI-ul de ieri a crescut cu 5,4% față de anul precedent, depășind așteptările și scăzând instantaneu de la 78.900 la 76.500. Problema nu este lumânarea în sine, ci probabilitatea unei creșteri a ratei de dobândă crescută la 70%. După spargeri consecutive eșuate peste 80.000, pozițiile lungi au fost lichidate. Dacă IPC devine mai ridicat în această situație, este ușor să continue să cadă
$ETH În prezent în jurul anului 2440, ritmul este practic sincronizat cu marea plăcintă
Variabila reală din această seară este IPC-ul din SUA din august. Dacă inflația de bază nu scade, Bitcoin ar putea reveni imediat la 76.500 sau chiar la 75.000
Abordarea actuală de tranzacționare:
Bitcoin: Short în intervalul 77.500-78.500, țintind în jur de 75.000-76.500
Ethereum: Short în intervalul 2470-2520, țintind în jur de 2320-2410
Dacă Bitcoin depășește 82.300 cu volumul crescut, poziția short va fi anulată imediat, iar tendința nu va fi menținută niciodată
Ce părere aveți: după implementarea IPC-ului, ar trebui ca big bing să ajungă mai întâi la 75.000 sau va crește direct la 80.000?
#OKX星球话题来啦
#波动雷达: Monitorizarea fluctuațiilor valutare
+389,24%
Instantaneu realizat la 11 sept. 2026, 08:37
#OracleAdobeToday AI demand is no longer the question. The bill is 👀
Oracle has a massive $638B backlog, but investors want to see how quickly it becomes revenue and whether that cash can outrun AI capex. Adobe faces a similar test with Firefly and GenStudio: can AI lift revenue without eating margins?
What caught my attention is the shift.
From Oracle's cloud to Adobe's software and Apple's AI hardware, the race is moving from building AI to proving it actually pays.
One earnings night, two very different verdicts on the AI trade.
Broadcom beat on revenue and adjusted EPS, with revenue up 86% to $29.6B and AI semiconductor sales more than tripling to $16.7B. But its $34.8B Q4 revenue guide landed roughly in line with Street expectations, and shares briefly fell more than 6% in early after-hours trading before paring most of the decline.
The irony: Broadcom still expects Q4 AI semiconductor revenue of $21.7B, up 236% and equal to roughly 62% of total guidance. Management also expects AI revenue of about $115B in FY27 and $230B in FY28.
Snowflake told the opposite story. Product revenue rose 37% to $1.49B, marking a third straight quarter of accelerating growth. Full-year product revenue guidance increased to $6.07B, and shares jumped more than 21% after hours.
· CoCo reached 9,100 accounts, adding 2,000+ this quarter
· CoWork expanded to 5,800 accounts, up nearly 11% sequentially
· Remaining performance obligations rose 30% to $9B
· Non-GAAP operating margin guidance increased from 13.5% to 14.5%, showing improving operating leverage
Add Dell's results from the prior night: it booked $60.9B in AI server orders, raised its AI server revenue outlook from $60B to $74B, and exited the quarter with a $95B backlog.
The pattern is clear: AI demand is spreading from chips to servers, data cloud and software. But AI exposure alone may no longer be enough. The market is increasingly rewarding acceleration against already-high expectations.
Beat without enough upside, and a stock can still sell off. Beat and raise, and the market may reprice.
Crypto markets know the same tension: a narrative can weaken before growth disappears, simply because the pace starts slowing.
What matters more for AI stocks now: absolute growth or the pace of acceleration?
#AVGODipsSNOWPops $XAVGO $XSNOW $XDELL
Oracle and Adobe earnings are on my radar, but I’m watching them for completely different reasons.
For Oracle, I want to see whether all the excitement around AI infrastructure is still translating into stronger cloud demand. Companies are spending heavily on computing capacity, and Oracle has positioned itself right in the middle of that buildout.
Adobe is a different story. Its challenge isn’t building AI infrastructure it’s proving that AI can strengthen its software business. With generative AI becoming easier to access, I’m curious whether tools like Firefly can bring in new users and revenue while protecting the value of Adobe’s existing products.
Personally, Adobe is the more interesting test for me. We already know companies are willing to spend billions building AI. The harder question now is whether software companies can turn AI into something customers consistently pay for.
#OracleAdobeEarnings $BTC